Sequential vs. Simultaneous Schelling Models: Experimental Evidence
Juan Benito (),
Penelope Hernandez () and
Juan A. Sanchis Llopis ()
No 510, Discussion Papers in Economic Behaviour from University of Valencia, ERI-CES
This paper shows the results of experiments where subjects play the Schelling's spatial proximity model (1969, 1971a). Two types of experiments are conducted; one in which choices are made sequentially, and a variation of the first where the decision-making is simultaneous. The results of the sequential experiments are identical to Schelling's prediction: subjects finish in a segregated equilibrium. Likewise, in the variant of the simultaneous decision experiment the same result is reached: segregation. Subjects’ heterogeneity generates a series of focal points in the first round. In order to locate themselves, subjects use these focal points immediately, and as a result, the segregation takes place again. Furthermore, simultaneous experiments with commuting costs allow us to conclude that introducing positive moving costs does not affect segregation.
Keywords: Schelling models; economic experiments; segregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Sequential versus Simultaneous Schelling Models: Experimental Evidence (2011)
Working Paper: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Schelling Models: Experimental Evidence (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbe:wpaper:0510
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers in Economic Behaviour from University of Valencia, ERI-CES Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emilio Calvo Ramón ().