Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design
Andreea Cosnita-Langlais ()
No 2015-31, EconomiX Working Papers from University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX
This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of the main procedural choices for merger control enforcement. At each relevant stage we highlight the economic trade-offs behind the corresponding procedural choices: mandatory vs voluntary pre-merger notification, ex ante vs ex post merger review, and the type of decision eventually made, binary or not. The paper also identifies the missing debates that still need formal treatment. Our study provides insight for the optimal procedural design of merger control, and as such may be useful to understand the different choices made by the various jurisdictions for merger policy enforcement.
Keywords: merger control; enforcement; procedural design. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K21 L41 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-ino and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Enforcement of Merger Control. Theoretical Insights for Its Procedural Design (2016)
Working Paper: Enforcement of merger control: theoretical insights for its procedural design (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:drm:wpaper:2015-31
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in EconomiX Working Papers from University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valerie Mignon ().