Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design

Andreea Cosnita-Langlais

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of the main procedural choices for merger control enforcement. At each relevant stage we highlight the economic trade-offs behind the corresponding procedural choices: mandatory vs voluntary pre-merger notification, ex ante vs ex post merger review, and the type of decision eventually made, binary or not. The paper also identifies the missing debates that still need formal treatment. Our study provides insight for the optimal procedural design of merger control, and as such may be useful to understand the different choices made by the various jurisdictions for merger policy enforcement.

Keywords: merger control; enforcement; procedural design. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04141387
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04141387/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Enforcement of Merger Control. Theoretical Insights for Its Procedural Design (2016)
Working Paper: Enforcement of merger control: theoretical insights for its procedural design (2016)
Working Paper: Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04141387

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().