Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses

Fabrice Cavarretta (), Sean Hannah (), Ronald Piccolo () and Mary Uhl-Bien ()
Additional contact information
Fabrice Cavarretta: ESSEC Business School, Postal: 3 avenue Bernard Hirsch, CS 50105 Cergy, 95021 Cergy Pontoise cedex, FRANCE,, http://www.essec.edu
Sean Hannah: Wake Forest University, Schools of Business, Postal: 1834 WAKE FOREST ROAD, WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27106, UNITED STATES, http://business.wfu.edu
Ronald Piccolo: Rollins College, Crummer Graduate School of Business, Postal: 1000 Holt Ave, Winter Park, FL 32789, UNITED STATES
Mary Uhl-Bien: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, College of Business Administration, Postal: CBA 269. P.O Box 880491, Lincoln, NE 68588-0491, UNITED STATES

No WP1519, ESSEC Working Papers from ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School

Abstract: Leadership theories often include a contingency effect where the relationship between two or more variables is normally theorized to be monotonic, i.e., that it has a generally accepted direction—positive or negative—across the full range of the contingency variable. Most examinations of contingencies estimate how the monotonic relationship changes at mean, or near mean, levels of the moderator variable. We push the logic of moderation further to explore whether, for extra-ordinary values of the moderator, the effect may actually become non-monotonic, e.g., invert by moving from positive to negative in slope (or vice versa). Discovering such inversion effects in models of leadership would provide a deeper understanding of the operation and boundaries of theories, thereby calling for refinements of underlying theoretical assumptions. Using an innovative inductive approach, we search the leadership literature and find studies where extra-ordinary moderator values signal a potential inversion effect. We narrow onto two example leader-member exchange (LMX) studies to inductively theorize the mechanisms creating the inversion. We then generalize the logic of this mechanism to propose new theory for why such inversions might be occurring in a wider range of phenomenon beyond LMX, and discuss the associated implications for leadership and organizational theory.

Keywords: leadership; moderation; inversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 L20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 pages
Date: 2015-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal-essec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01214027v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:essewp:dr-15019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ESSEC Working Papers from ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School ESSEC Research Center, BP 105, 95021 Cergy, France. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sophie Magnanou ().