Ethan Ligon () and
No 128, Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic Society
Traditional poverty measures neglect several important dimensions of household welfare. In this paper we construct a measure of ``vulnerability'' which allows us to quantify the welfare loss associated with poverty as well as the loss associated with any of a variety of different sources of uncertainty. Applying our measure to a panel dataset from Bulgaria in 1994, we find that poverty and risk play roughly equal roles in reducing welfare. Aggregate shocks are more important than idiosyncratic sources of risk, but households headed by an employed, educated male are less vulnerable to aggregate shocks than are other households.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Measuring Vulnerability (2003)
Working Paper: MEASURING VULNERABILITY (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:ac2002:128
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().