Market Size and Geographical Advantage

Sylvia Gottschalk

No 90, Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic Society

Abstract: This paper examines the geographical distribution of firms whithin integrating countries, when regions differ in market sizes and in location with respect to a foreign manufacturing core. We found that geographical proximity of a poor region to the core allows the latter's manufacturing industry to expand when trade costs are very low. However, at intermediate trade costs, regional market size is a stronger determinant of the location of industries. Firms are less likely to locate in small regions close to larger cores than in large peripheral regions. Proximity may expose local industries to increased competition from imports and lead firms to leave the region. Regional policies which finance infrastructure in a small region and increases its accessability can thus be detrimental to local industries without a strong local consumer market. The distribution of welfare gains from trade varies according to consumers' geographical location. Consumers located in a poor region but close to a manufacturing core may experience higher welfare gains than consumers located in the peripheral region.

Date: 2002-08-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/res2002/Gottschalk.pdf full text

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:ac2002:90

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().