Party Discipline and Pork-Barrel Politics

Gene Grossman and Elhanan Helpman

Papers from Princeton University, Research Program in Political Economy

Abstract: Polities differ in the extent to which political parties can pre-commit to carry out promised policy actions if they take power. Commitment problems may arise due to a divergence between the ex ante incentives facing national parties that seek to capture control of the legislature and the ex post incentives facing individual legislators, whose interests may be more parochial. We study how differences in "party discipline" shape fiscal policy choices. In particular, we examine the determinants of national spending on local public goods in a three-stage game of campaign rhetoric, voting, and legislative decision-making. We find that the rhetoric and reality of pork-barrel spending, and also the efficiency of the spending regime, bear a non-monotonic relationship to the degree of party discipline.

JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11396.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Party Discipline and Pork-Barrel Politics (2005)
Working Paper: Party Discipline and Pork-Barrel Politics (2005)
Working Paper: Party Discipline and Pork Barrel Politics (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:prirpe:08-10-2005

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from Princeton University, Research Program in Political Economy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().