The BP Amoco/ARCO Merger: Alaskan Crude Oil

Jeremy I. Bulow and Carl Shapiro
Additional contact information
Jeremy I. Bulow: Stanford U

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: The merger of British Petroleum and Atlantic Richfield as proposed would have made BP the sole operator and 70 percent owner of Alaska's oil fields. The Federal Trade Commission challenged the merger partly out of concern for higher West Coast gasoline prices, and required a divestiture ARCO's entire Alaskan business. However, West Coast crude prices are governed by the cost of the marginal source of supply to the region, imported oil. Because any cutback in sales of Alaskan oil on the West Coast could be offset with higher imports, with minimal impact on the import price, the merger would have raised crude prices by tenths of a penny per gallon at the most. The impact on consumer prices was even more tenuous. More serious concerns, which were given less attention, were that BP might gain monopsony power in bidding for oil leases and perhaps in negotiating with suppliers.

Date: 2002-11
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1739R.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to gsbapps.stanford.edu:443 (certificate verify failed) (http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1739R.pdf [302 Found]--> https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1739R.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:1739r

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().