Is Business Cycle Volatility Costly? Evidence from Surveys of Subjective Well-Being

Justin Wolfers

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of business cycle volatility on measures of subjective well-being, including self-reported happiness and life satisfaction. I find robust evidence that high inflation and, to a greater extent, unemployment lower perceived well-being. Greater macroeconomic volatility also undermines well-being. These effects are moderate but important: eliminating unemployment volatility would raise well-being by an amount roughly equal to that from lowering the average level of unemployment by a quarter of a percentage point. The effects of inflation volatility on well-being are less easy to detect and are likely smaller.

Date: 2003-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (153)

Downloads: (external link)
http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1751(R).pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to gsbapps.stanford.edu:443 (Bad file descriptor) (http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1751(R).pdf [302 Found]--> https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1751(R).pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Is Business Cycle Volatility Costly? Evidence from Surveys of Subjective Well‐Being (2003)
Working Paper: Is Business Cycle Volatility Costly? Evidence from Surveys of Subjective Wellbeing (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:1751r

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().