Is a theory of total factor productivity really needed?
Jesus Felipe and
CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University
This paper addresses the question of whether or not a theory of total factor productivity (TFP) is needed in order to explain the documented large per capita income differences across countries. As the argument that it is needed has been reached by calculating TFP empirically, we show that the way the estimates of TFP have been computed is not an innocuous issue. To prove our point, we discuss how two well-known textbooks on growth theory present the arguments and the problems associated with these expositions. We conclude that the tautological nature of the estimates of TFP lies at the heart of an important question that the empirical literature on economic growth has been dealing with during recent years. Hence, our arguments cast doubt on the need for a theory of TFP.
JEL-codes: O11 O16 O47 O53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/fil ... felipepaper_2004.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: IS A THEORY OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY REALLY NEEDED? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:een:camaaa:2004-12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cama Admin ().