Quantitative or qualitative forward guidance: Does it matter?

Gunda-Alexandra Detmers, Ozer Karagedikli and Richhild Moessner

CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Abstract: Is publishing central bank projections of the policy rate a better way of managing market expectations than with written statements, and does it lead to overreactions by markets? To answer this, we use a quasi-experiment from the policy announcements of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ). Every monetary policy decision by the RBNZ is accompanied by a written statement about the state of the economy and the policy outlook, but only every second decision is accompanied by a published interest rate forecast. We exploit this difference in the information accompanying decisions to study the relative influences of qualitative and quantitative forward guidance. We find that the information releases have significant effects on asset prices regardless of the nature of the communication (quantitative or qualitative). Announcements that include an interest rate projection lead to very similar market reactions across the yield curve as announcements that only include written statements. This control-treatment approach suggests that earlier studies may overstate the effects of publishing interest rate forecasts on market prices: it is not only the interest rate forecasts that markets react to, as they seem to infer similar forward guidance from written statements. We interpret our results as implying that central bank communication is important, but that the exact form of that communication is less critical. Our results also suggest that market participants understand the conditional nature of the RBNZ interest rate forecasts, and that concerns that markets read these forecasts as binding promises are unwarranted.

Keywords: Monetary policy; forward guidance; interest rate forecasts. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E43 E44 E52 E58 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2018-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-mac and nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/fil ... gedikli_moessner.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Quantitative or Qualitative Forward Guidance: Does it Matter? (2021)
Working Paper: Quantitative or qualitative forward guidance: Does it matter? (2018)
Working Paper: Quantitative or Qualitative Forward Guidance: Does it Matter? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:een:camaaa:2018-36

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cama Admin ().