Accounting for the impact of conservation on human well-being

Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland, J.A. Mcgregor, Matthew Agarwala, Giles Atkinson, P. Bevan, Tom J. Clements, T. Daw, Katherine Homewood, Noëlle F. Kümpel, J. Lewis, Susana Mourato (), Benjamin N. Palmer Fry, M. Redshaw, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, S. Suon, G. Wallace, H. Washington and D. Wilkie

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Conservationists are increasingly engaging with the concept of human well-being to improve the design and evaluation of their interventions. Since the convening of the influential Sarkozy Commission in 2009, development researchers have been refining conceptualizations and frameworks to understand and measure human well-being and are starting to converge on a common understanding of how best to do this. In conservation, the term human well-being is in widespread use, but there is a need for guidance on operationalizing it to measure the impacts of conservation interventions on people. We present a framework for understanding human well-being, which could be particularly useful in conservation. The framework includes 3 conditions; meeting needs, pursuing goals, and experiencing a satisfactory quality of life. We outline some of the complexities involved in evaluating the well-being effects of conservation interventions, with the understanding that well-being varies between people and over time and with the priorities of the evaluator. Key challenges for research into the well-being impacts of conservation interventions include the need to build up a collection of case studies so as to draw out generalizable lessons; harness the potential of modern technology to support well-being research; and contextualize evaluations of conservation impacts on well-being spatially and temporally within the wider landscape of social change. Pathways through the smog of confusion around the term well-being exist, and existing frameworks such as the Well-being in Developing Countries approach can help conservationists negotiate the challenges of operationalizing the concept. Conservationists have the opportunity to benefit from the recent flurry of research in the development field so as to carry out more nuanced and locally relevant evaluations of the effects of their interventions on human well-being.

Keywords: development; ecosystem services; impact evaluation; intervention; poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-hap
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Published in Conservation Biology, October, 2014, 28(5), pp. 1160-1166. ISSN: 0888-8892

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/56312/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:56312

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().