Economics at your fingertips  

The Economy-Wide Rebound Effect and Climate Policy Effectiveness in a Multiregional General Equilibrium Framework

Ramiro Parrado ()

No 5429, EcoMod2013 from EcoMod

Abstract: The insights about an increased energy consumption following efficiency improvements from technical progress, proposed initially by Jevons (1866), have significant implications on the effectiveness of energy efficiency policies. Moreover, the essential role of energy and its efficiency either in economic development or in climate change mitigation might have different and sometimes contradictory outcomes. On the one hand, economic development is closely related to an increasing use of energy while on the other hand, the rising demand for energy might be related to an increased use of fossil fuels or other polluting activities with negative consequences on the environment and climate. Therefore, rebound effects should be taken into account for policy design and assessment. In this context, there are two main concerns for climate policy regarding the rebound effect and economic development. First, the negative implications of the rebound effect might reduce the effectiveness of energy efficiency improvements, as shown by the empirical evidence. This could lead to disregard the promotion of efficiency and technology transfer policies related to technical progress and a more efficient use of energy. Second, curbing greenhouse gas emissions through reduced economic growth creates an obstacle in reaching a global agreement to deal with global warming. Nevertheless, appropriately considering the rebound effect in policy design could provide an opportunity to address both concerns at the same time. Until now, most of the studies about direct rebound effects have focused on selected sectors, which mostly depend on data availability to provide empirical estimates. For policy design purposes, those estimates must be considered bearing in mind indirect and second order effects due to market interactions. This could enhance or reduce the policy effectiveness, moreover if the policy is related to a global problem such as global warming. The general equilibrium framework has proven to be a good alternative to assess those indirect and economy-wide interactions. However, until now, economy-wide rebound estimates have focused on single country analyses disregarding propagation channels that could also affect energy demand in the rest of the world. This paper addresses this concern providing insights about economy-wide rebound effects with international feedbacks. Furthermore, implementing specific policies in selected sectors and countries could provide a synergic outcome for both development and climate strategies. In particular, the main objectives of the paper are: i) to provide an analysis of the economy-wide rebound effect by means of a multi-region and multi-sector dynamic recursive CGE model, ii) to estimate specific rebound effects considering single energy commodities one at a time and also for each region in the model, and iii) to offer insights about the effectiveness of both energy efficiency and climate policies at the regional level and by type of energy to select potential effective combinations for climate and development policy implementation. The extent of how much an energy efficiency improvement might be taken back because of the Jevons’ paradox, also called the Khazoom-Brookes postulate, has been theoretically analysed considering different functional formulations. It has also been tested empirically for specific sectors using different methodologies through historical data analysis, econometric estimations, and numerical simulations, most of them highlighting the importance of rebound effects. The economy-wide rebound effect has been studied using a general equilibrium framework both from a theoretical and a numerically perspective. One of the advantages of using CGE models is that it allows providing a counterfactual scenario that is used to calculate better estimates. However, most of the studies rely on an autonomous technical change specification, which makes it difficult to tackle the endogenous aspect of induced energy efficiency. In addition, the existent CGE studies have focused on single countries, applying simultaneous energy efficiency improvements in the use of different kinds of energy across several productive sectors at the same time. Therefore, the corresponding rebound estimates show a compounded-aggregated effect without differentiating the particular source related to a specific energy commodity. Furthermore, there is a lack of an analysis using a global equilibrium model including additional feedback channels through international trade and knowledge accumulation. This paper is a first attempt to contribute to the rebound effect literature adopting a general equilibrium approach enhanced with international trade flows and endogenous technical change based on a stock of knowledge. This allows accounting for technical progress and policy-induced behaviour triggered through price signals. The results of this paper suggest that short-run rebound effect estimates in general equilibrium are higher compared to direct rebound empirical estimations based on partial equilibrium. Regarding capital-energy substitution, lower elasticities produce also lower rebound. In addition, the rebound effect seems to be more sensible to lower elasticities of supply for fossil fuels and inter-fuel substitution than to substitution between capital and energy. Within the majority of industries, a carbon tax policy is much more effective than energy efficiency use policies, due to a lower rebound. However there are some exceptions depending on the sector and country. This should be taken into account when designing climate and energy efficiency policies.

Keywords: Multi-region and Multi-sector model; Energy and environmental policy; General equilibrium modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-06-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden ( [301 Moved Permanently]-->

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EcoMod2013 from EcoMod Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Theresa Leary ().

Page updated 2020-03-29
Handle: RePEc:ekd:004912:5429