Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach
Dennis Dittrich,
Werner Güth () and
Boris Maciejovsky
Papers on Strategic Interaction from Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group
Abstract:
We experimentally test overconfidence in investment decisions by offering partic- ipants the possibility to substitute their own for alternative investment choices. Overall, 149 subjects participated in two experiments, one with just one risky as- set, the other with two risky assets. Overconfidence increases (i) with the absolute deviation from optimal choices, (ii) with task complexity, and (iii) decreases with uncertainty as indicated by the difference between willingness to pay and to accept.
Keywords: Risky decision making; Behavioral finance; Portfolio choice; Experimental economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D81 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
ftp://papers.econ.mpg.de/esi/discussionpapers/2001-03.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Failed to connect to FTP server papers.econ.mpg.de: No such host is known.
Related works:
Working Paper: Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:esi:discus:2001-03
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.econ.mpg. ... arch/ESI/discuss.php
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers on Strategic Interaction from Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Karin Richter ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).