Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory

James Cox and Vjollca Sadiraj

No 2006-03, Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series from Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University

Abstract: A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a plausible theory of risk aversion for both small-stakes and large-stakes gambles; and (b) this decision theory should be replaced with an alternative theory characterized by loss aversion. This paper explains that the arguments in previous literature fail to support these conclusions. Either concavity calibration has no general implication for expected utility theory or it has problematic implications for all decision theories that involve concave transformations (utility or value functions) of positive money payoffs, which makes loss aversion irrelevant to the argument

Pages: 31
Date: 2007-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (46)

Downloads: (external link)
http://excen.gsu.edu/workingpapers/GSU_EXCEN_WP_2006-03.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:exc:wpaper:2006-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series from Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by J. Todd Swarthout ().