How can behavioral economics inform non-market valuation? An example from the preference reversal literature
Wiktor Adamowicz,
Jonathan Alevy () and
John List
Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Abstract:
Psychological insights have made inroads within most major areas of study in economics. One area where less advance has been made is environmental and resource economics. In this study, we examine the implications of preference reversals over evaluation modes, in which stated economic values critically depend on whether the good is valued jointly with others or in isolation. The question arises because two commonly used methods for eliciting stated preferences differ in that one presents objects together and another presents objects to be evaluated in isolation. Beyond showing an example of the import of behavioral economics, our empirical evidence sheds new light on the factors associated with insensitivity of valuations to the scope of the good
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00002.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature (2011)
Working Paper: How can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature (2010)
Working Paper: How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:artefa:00002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().