Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment

Craig Landry, Andreas Lange, John List, Michael Price and Nicholas Rupp

Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website

Abstract: This study develops theory and conducts an experiment to provide an understanding of why people initially give to charities, why they remain committed to the cause, and what factors attenuate these influences. Using an experimental design that links donations across distinct treatments separated in time, we present several insights. For example, we find that previous donors are more likely to give, and contribute more, than donors asked to contribute for the first time. Yet, how these previous donors were acquired is critical: agents who are initially attracted by signals of charitable quality transmitted via an economic mechanism are much more likely to continue giving than agents who were initially attracted by non-mechanism factors.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (42)

Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00077.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Is a Donor in Hand Better Than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment (2010)
Working Paper: Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:artefa:00077

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Artefactual Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta (fpagnotta@uchicago.edu).