The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated wtp values: Evidence from a field study

Erwin Bulte, Aart de Zeeuw, Shelby Gerking and John List

Framed Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website

Abstract: Standard applications of utility theory assume that utility depends solely on outcomes and not on causes. This study uses a field experiment conducted in the Netherlands to determine if alternative causes of an environmental problem affect willingness to pay to ameliorate it. We find evidence supporting the hypothesis that people are willing to pay significantly more to correct problems caused by humans than by nature (the "outrage effect"), but find no support for the hypothesis that "moral responsibility" matters. We also find support for the hypothesis that stated willingness to pay values obtained via "cheap talk" and "consequential" treatments are lower than without inclusion of these protocols.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00134.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study (2005)
Working Paper: The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: Evidence from a field study (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:framed:00134

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Framed Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().