Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in minnesota

Marsha Blumenthal, Charles Christian and Joel Slemrod

Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website

Abstract: In 1995 a group of 1724 randomly selected Minnesota taxpayers was informed by letter that the returns they were about to file would be 'closely examined'. Compared to a control group that did not receive this letter, low and middle-income taxpayers in the treatment group on average increased tax payments compared to the previous year, which we interpret as indicating the presence of noncompliance. The effect was much stronger for those with more opportunity to evade; in fact, the difference in differences is not statistically significant for those who do not have self-employment or farm income, and do not pay estimated tax. Surprisingly, however, the reported tax liability of the high income treatment group fell sharply relative to the control group.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (421)

Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00332.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00332

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().