Intermediation in Markets for Goods and Markets for Assets

Ed Nosal, Linda Wong () and Randall Wright

No 2019-5, FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Abstract: We analyze agents' decisions to act as producers or intermediaries using equilibrium search theory. Extending previous analyses in various ways, we ask when intermediation emerges and study its efficiency. In one version of the framework, meant to resemble retail, middlemen hold goods, which entails (storage) costs; that model always displays uniqueness and simple transition dynamics. In another version, middlemen hold assets, which entails negative costs, that is, positive returns; that model can have multiple equilibria and complicated belief-based dynamics. These results are consistent with the venerable view that intermediation in financial markets is more prone to instability than in goods markets.

Keywords: middlemen; intermediation; search; bargaining; multiplicity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 G24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 47 pages
Date: 2019-03-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.frbatlanta.org/-/media/documents/resea ... ssets-2019-03-27.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Intermediation in markets for goods and markets for assets (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedawp:2019-05

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

DOI: 10.29338/wp2019-05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rob Sarwark ().