Demandable debt as a means of payment: banknotes versus checks

Charles Kahn and William Roberds

No 98-5, FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Abstract: We examine the question of whether transactable forms of privately issued, demandable debt are better used as \"banknotes\" or \"checks.\" The distinction between the two is that a check must be redeemed by the issuing bank with each use, whereas a banknote can circulate. We find that the answer to the question depends critically on the cost of early redemption. If this cost is small, banknotes will not circulate, so the question is moot. If this cost is large, incentive problems will prevent the issue of banknotes. For intermediate values of the early redemption cost, the option of early redemption limits the bank's risk-taking behavior, so that banknotes will be preferred over checks.

Keywords: Checks; Money; Payment systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mon
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, August 1999

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.atlantafed.org/-/media/Documents/resea ... s/wp/1998/wp9805.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Demandable debt as a means of payment: banknotes versus checks (1999)
Journal Article: Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedawp:98-5

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rob Sarwark ().