An experimental study of circuit breakers: the effects of mandated market closures and temporary halts on market behavior
Lucy Ackert (),
Bryan K. Church and
No 99-1, FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
This paper analyzes the effect of circuit breakers on price behavior, trading volume, and profit-making ability in a market setting. We conduct nine experimental asset markets to compare behavior across three regulatory regimes: market closure, temporary halt, and no interruption. The presence of a circuit breaker rule does not affect the magnitude of the absolute deviation in price from fundamental value or trading profit. The primary driver of behavior is information asymmetry in the market. By comparison, trading activity is significantly affected by the presence of a circuit breaker. Mandated market closures cause market participants to advance trades.
Keywords: Financial markets; Flow of funds; Stock market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.frbatlanta.org//filelegacydocs/wp9901.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.frbatlanta.org/filelegacydocs/wp9901.pdf)
Journal Article: An experimental study of circuit breakers: The effects of mandated market closures and temporary halts on market behavior (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedawp:99-1
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FRB Atlanta Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Elaine Clokey ().