Failed bank resolution and the collateral crunch: the advantages of adopting transferable puts

Eric Rosengren () and Katerina Simons

No 92-5, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Abstract: Current methods of failed bank resolution are unnecessarily expensive for taxpayers and impose substantial costs on borrowers at failed banks. This situation is due to distorted incentives imbedded in the standard contract between the government and acquirers of failed banks, which result in more loan foreclosures than if the loan were held by a well-capitalized bank. This paper proposes a modification to the standard contract in the form of a transferable put, which would introduce market-based incentives to the disposition of failed bank assets.

Keywords: Bank; failures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in AREUEA 22, no. 1 (Spring 1994): 135-47.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/wp/wp1992/wp92_5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Failed Bank Resolution and the Collateral Crunch: The Advantages of Adopting Transferable Puts (1994)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbwp:92-5

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Spozio ().