Should monetary policy \"lean or clean\"?
William R. White
No 34, Globalization Institute Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
It has been contended by many in the central banking community that monetary policy would not be effective in \"leaning\" against the upswing of a credit cycle (the boom) but that lower interest rates would be effective in \"cleaning\" up (the bust) afterwards. In this paper, these two propositions (can't lean, but can clean) are examined and found seriously deficient. In particular, it is contended in this paper that monetary policies designed solely to deal with short term problems of insufficient demand could make medium term problems worse by encouraging a buildup of debt that cannot be sustained over time. The conclusion reached is that monetary policy should be more focused on \"preemptive tightening\" to moderate credit bubbles than on \"preemptive easing\" to deal with the after effects. There is a need for a new macrofinancial stability framework that would use both regulatory and monetary instruments to resist credit bubbles and thus promote sustainable economic growth over time.
JEL-codes: E5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-mac and nep-mon
Note: Published as: White, William R. (2009), "Should Monetary Policy Lean or Clean: A Reassessment," Central Banking 19 (4): 32-42.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:feddgw:34
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Globalization Institute Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().