Local Labor Market Tightness and Job Quality: Evidence from Job Changers

Brad Hershbein, Katherine Lim, Douglas Webber and Mike Zabek

No 2026-043, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: Using novel data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, we examine how labor market tightness affects workers’ job quality. We estimate that a 10 percent increase in job vacancies not only increases the probability of changing jobs, it yields an 11–18 percent increase in the (unconditional) probability of switching to a better job overall, and one with greater pay and benefits, interest in the work, and advancement opportunities. Because tight labor markets improve both worker pay and job amenities in roughly the same proportion, their benefits to workers are underestimated when based on pay alone.

Keywords: job quality; labor market tightness; Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED); Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS); Lightcast; local shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J23 J28 J32 J62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 68 p.
Date: 2026-06-22
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2026043pap.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Local Labor Market Tightness and Job Quality: Evidence from Job Changers (2026)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:103443

DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2026.043

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().