An Evaluation of Difference-in-Differences Methods Using Placebo Event Studies

John Coglianese and Jade A. Fang
Additional contact information
John Coglianese: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/john-m-coglianese.htm

No 2026-045, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: Researchers are faced with the choice of which of the many recently developed difference-in-differences methods to use in practice. To assess these estimators' relative performance for single-unit event studies, we conduct 134,000+ state-level placebo event studies across 13 estimators. We find that no single method dominates. Performance is context-dependent, with synthetic-control-like methods sometimes outperforming and sometimes underperforming two-way-fixed-effect-like and matching methods. Performance also varies across states at least as much as it does across estimators. Our results highlight the need for practitioners to conduct placebo tests to understand the performance of methods in their research context.

Keywords: difference-in-differences; event studies; local labor markets; placebo tests; two-way fixed effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 p.
Date: 2026-06-24
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2026045pap.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:103446

DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2026.045

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().