Robust monetary policy with misspecified models: does model uncertainty always call for attenuated policy?
Robert Tetlow and
Peter von zur Muehlen ()
No 2000-28, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)
Abstract:
This paper explores Knightian model uncertainty as a possible explanation of the considerable difference between estimated interest rate rules and optimal feedback descriptions of monetary policy. We focus on two types of uncertainty: (i) unstructured model uncertainty reflected in additive shock error processes that result from omitted-variable misspecifications, and (ii) structured model uncertainty, where one or more parameters are identified as the source of misspecification. For an estimated forward-looking model of the U.S. economy, we find that rules that are robust against uncertainty, the nature of which is unspecifiable, or against one-time parametric shifts, are more aggressive than the optimal linear quadratic rule. However, policies designed to protect the economy against the worst-case consequences of misspecified dynamics are less aggressive and turn out to be good approximations of the estimated rule. A possible drawback of such policies is that the losses incurred from protecting against worst-case scenarios are concentrated among the same business cycle frequencies that normally occupy the attention of policymakers.
Keywords: Monetary policy; Interest rates; Econometric models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mon
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2000/200028/200028abs.html (text/html)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2000/200028/200028pap.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Robust monetary policy with misspecified models: Does model uncertainty always call for attenuated policy? (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2000-28
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().