Diverging measures of capacity utilization: an explanation

Norman J. Morin and John Stevens ()
Additional contact information
Norman J. Morin: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/norman-j-morin.htm

No 2004-58, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: In the wake of the recent recovery in manufacturing production, the capacity utilization rates published by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) have rebounded much more slowly than those published by the Institute for Supply Management (ISM). As a result, some observers have speculated that the manufacturing sector may have considerably less slack than is indicated by the FRB measures. Our view is that the two characterizations of manufacturing slack are not as incongruent as they first appear. This paper discusses the practical and conceptual differences between these measures of capacity utilization, and concludes that the recent divergence simply reflects the character of the latest business cycle.

Keywords: Industrial capacity; Statistical methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2004/200458/200458abs.html (text/html)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2004/200458/200458pap.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Diverging Measures of Capacity Utilization: An Explanation (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2004-58

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().