Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review

Puriya Abbassi, Rajkamal Iyer, Jose-Luis Peydro and Paul E. Soto
Additional contact information
Paul E. Soto: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/paul-e-soto.htm

No 2023-021, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: We study short-term and medium-term changes in bank risk-taking as a result of supervision, and the associated real effects. For identification, we exploit the European Central Bank's asset-quality review (AQR) in conjunction with security and credit registers. After the AQR announcement, reviewed banks reduce riskier securities and credit supply, with the greatest effect on riskiest securities. We find negative spillovers on asset prices and firm-level credit availability. Moreover, non-banks with higher exposure to reviewed banks acquire the shed risk. After the AQR compliance, reviewed banks reload riskier securities but not riskier credit, resulting in negative medium-term firm-level real effects. These effects are especially strong for firms with high ex-ante credit risk. Among these non-safe firms, even those with high ex-ante productivity experience negative real effects. Our findings suggest that banks' liquid assets help them to mask risk from supervisors and risk adjustments banks make in response to supervision have persistent corporate real effects.

Keywords: Corporate real effects from bank credit; Asset quality review; Stress tests; Supervision; Risk-masking; Costs of safe assets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E58 G21 G28 H63 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 63 p.
Date: 2023-04-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban, nep-eec and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2023021pap.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review (2020)
Working Paper: Stressed banks? Evidence from the largest-ever supervisory review (2020)
Working Paper: Stressed banks? Evidence from the largest-ever supervisory review (2020)
Working Paper: Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2023-21

DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2023.021

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().