Targeting vs. instrument rules for monetary policy
Bennett McCallum and
Edward Nelson
No 2004-011, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Abstract:
Svensson (2003) argues strongly that specific targeting rules*first order optimality conditions for a specific objective function and model*are normatively superior to instrument rules for the conduct of monetary policy. That argument is based largely upon four main objections to the latter plus a claim concerning the relative interest-instrument variability entailed by the two approaches. The present paper considers the four objections in turn, and advances arguments that contradict all of them. Then in the paper*s analytical sections, it is demonstrated that the variability claim is incorrect, for a neo-canonical model and also for a variant with one-period-ahead plans used by Svensson, providing that the same decision-making errors are relevant under the two alternative approaches. Arguments relating to general targeting rules and actual central bank practice are also included.
Keywords: Monetary policy; Banks and banking, Central (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-mac and nep-mon
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Published in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, September/October 2005, 87(5), pp. 597-611
Downloads: (external link)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2004/2004-011.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Targeting versus instrument rules for monetary policy (2005) 
Working Paper: Targeting vs. Instrument Rules for Monetary Policy (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2004-011
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
DOI: 10.20955/wp.2004.011
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().