Racial profiling or racist policing? bounds tests in aggregate data

Ruben Hernandez-Murillo and John Knowles

No 2004-012, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Abstract: State-wide reports on police traffic stops and searches summarize very large populations, making them potentially powerful tools for identifying racial bias, particularly when statistics on search outcomes are included. But when the reported statistics conflate searches involving different levels of police discretion, standard tests for racial bias are not applicable. This paper develops a model of police search decisions that allows for non-discretionary searches and derives tests for racial bias in data that mixes different search types. Our tests reject unbiased policing as an explanation of the disparate impact of motor-vehicle searches on minorities in Missouri

Keywords: Households; Public policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Published in International Economic Review, August 2004, 45(3), pp. 959-89

Downloads: (external link)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2004/2004-012.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: RACIAL PROFILING OR RACIST POLICING? BOUNDS TESTS IN AGGREGATE DATA (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2004-012

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

DOI: 10.20955/wp.2004.012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().