Racial profiling or racist policing? bounds tests in aggregate data
Ruben Hernandez-Murillo () and
John Knowles ()
No 2004-012, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
State-wide reports on police traffic stops and searches summarize very large populations, making them potentially powerful tools for identifying racial bias, particularly when statistics on search outcomes are included. But when the reported statistics conflate searches involving different levels of police discretion, standard tests for racial bias are not applicable. This paper develops a model of police search decisions that allows for non-discretionary searches and derives tests for racial bias in data that mixes different search types. Our tests reject unbiased policing as an explanation of the disparate impact of motor-vehicle searches on minorities in Missouri
Keywords: Households; Public policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in International Economic Review, August 2004, 45(3), pp. 959-89
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: RACIAL PROFILING OR RACIST POLICING? BOUNDS TESTS IN AGGREGATE DATA (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2004-012
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna Oates ().