The role of data & program code archives in the future of economic research

Richard Anderson (), William Greene, B McCullough and Hrishikesh Vinod

No 2005-014, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Abstract: This essay examines the role of data and program-code archives in making economic research \"replicable.\" Replication of published results is recognized as an essential part of the scientific method. Yet, historically, both the \"demand for\" and \"supply of\" replicable results in economics has been minimal. \"Respect for the scientific method\" is not sufficient to motivate either economists or editors of professional journals to ensure the replicability of published results. We enumerate the costs and benefits of mandatory data and code archives, and argue that the benefits far exceed the costs. Progress has been made since the gloomy assessment of Dewald, Thursby and Anderson some twenty years ago in the American Economic Review, but much remains to be done before empirical economics ceases to be a \"dismal science\" when judged by the replicability of its published results.

Keywords: Econometrics; Research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2005/2005-014.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2005-014

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

DOI: 10.20955/wp.2005.014

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().