The case against patents

Michele Boldrin and David Levine

No 2012-035, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Abstract: The case against patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity. There is strong evidence, instead, that patents have many negative consequences.

Keywords: Patents; Productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff, nep-ino, nep-ipr, nep-pr~, nep-pke and nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Case against Patents (2013)
Working Paper: The Case Against Patents (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2012-035

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
subscribe@stls.frb.org

DOI: 10.20955/wp.2012.035

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis (scott.stlouis@stls.frb.org).