Intergenerational policy and the measurement of tax incidence
Juan Carlos Conesa and
Carlos Garriga ()
No 2013-016, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Abstract:
We evaluate the ability of generational accounting to assess the potential welfare implications of policy reforms. In an intergenerational context policy reforms usually have redistributive, efficiency, and general equilibrium implications. Our analysis shows that when the policy reform implies changes in economic efficiency, generational accounts can be misleading not only about the magnitude of welfare changes, but also about the identity of who wins and who losses. In contrast the generational accounts correctly identify welfare changes when the policy reform has only a pure intergenerational redistribution component. We illustrate and quantify this issue in the context of widely considered policy reforms (substitution of consumption for labor taxation, and the increase of retirement age) and in a more general context of optimal policy.
Keywords: Generational accounts; optimal reforms; overlapping generations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E62 H21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-pbe and nep-pub
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2013/2013-016.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Intergenerational policy and the measurement of tax incidence (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2013-016
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().