Quality Adjustment in Industry Deflators Strengthens Estimated Innovation–Productivity Relationships

Enghin Atalay, Ali Hortacsu, Nicole Kimmel and Chad Syverson

No 26-22, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Abstract: How do investments in innovation translate into future productivity growth? Empirically answering this question is challenging. R&D spending is an observed input into the innovation process, but mapping it to productivity growth requires assumptions about the depreciation of R&D capital, gestation lags, and how well such expenditures capture true innovative effort (Hall, 2007). Patents, an alternative measure, capture successful innovations but vary widely in novelty (Kelly et al., 2021) and economic value (Kogan et al., 2017). Firms may forgo patenting to preserve secrecy, while others patent strategically to protect existing products even when their underlying innovations are marginal.

Keywords: productivity measurement; innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 E31 O31 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 2026-04-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... ers/2026/wp26-22.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Quality Adjustment in Industry Deflators Strengthens Estimated Innovation-Productivity Relationships (2026)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpwp:103326

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2026.22

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().