Consumption, stock returns, and the gains from international risk-sharing
Karen Lewis
No 96-6, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Abstract:
Standard theoretical models predict that domestic residents should diversify their portfolios into foreign assets much more than observed in practice. Whether this lack of diversification is important depends on the potential gains from risk-sharing. General equilibrium models and consumption data tend to find that the costs are small, typically less than 0.5% of permanent consumption. On the other hand, stock returns imply gains that are several hundred times larger. In this paper, the author examines the reasons for these differences and finds that the primary differences are due to (a) the much higher variability of stocks, and/or (b) the higher degree of risk aversion required to reconcile an international equity premium. Furthermore, contrary to conventional wisdom, treating stock returns as exogenous does not necessarily imply greater gains.
Keywords: Consumption (Economics); Investments; Stock market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/asset ... pers/1996/wp96-6.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Consumption, Stock Returns, and the Gains from International Risk-Sharing (1996)
Working Paper: Consumption, Stock Returns, and the Gains from International Risk-Sharing (1996) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedpwp:96-6
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Beth Paul ().