Comparative Politics and Public Finance

Torsten Persson (), Gérard Roland and Guido Tabellini

Working Papers from Stockholm - International Economic Studies

Abstract: The postwar neoclassical theory of normative public finance has been written from a Pigovian perspective. It addresses questions about optimal taxation and allocation of public goods from the perspective of a benevolent social planner. This field of research has produced many important principles and insights regarding what governments should do. It nevertheless suffers from an important weakness, which has been forcefully pointed out by the Public Choice school: it neglects that political representatives rationally follow their self-interest.

Keywords: PUBLIC FINANCE; POLITICS; TAXATION; PUBLIC GOODS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D7 H2 H4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52 pages
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparative Politics and Public Finance (1997)
Working Paper: Comparative Politics and Public Finance (1997)
Working Paper: Comparative Politics and Public Finance
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:stocin:633

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Stockholm - International Economic Studies UNIVERSITY OF STOCKHOLM, INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES, S- 106 91 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().