The Way People Lie in Markets
Chloe Tergiman () and
Marie Claire Villeval
Additional contact information
Chloe Tergiman: Smeal College of Business, 334 Business Building, Penn State University
No 1927, Working Papers from Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon
Abstract:
In a finitely repeated game with asymmetric information, we experimentally study how reputation and standard market mechanisms change the nature of fraudulent announcements by experts. While some lies can be detected ex post by investors, other lies remain deniable. Lying behavior suggests that individuals care more about the consequences of being caught, rather than the act of lying per se. Allowing for reputation reduces the frequency of lies that can be detected but has no impact on deniable lies: individuals simply hide their lies better and fraud persists. Competition without reputation increases risky lies and never protects investment.
Keywords: Dishonesty; Reputation; Competition; Financial Markets; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D01 G41 M21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
ftp://ftp.gate.cnrs.fr/RePEc/2019/1927.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The way people lie in markets (2020)
Working Paper: The way people lie in markets (2020)
Working Paper: The Way People Lie in Markets (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gat:wpaper:1927
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nelly Wirth ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).