Nutritional and economic impact of 5 alternative front-of-pack nutritional labels: experimental evidence
Paolo Crosetto (),
L. Muller and
Working Papers from Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL)
We study, in a laboratory framed field experiment, the impact of five Front of Pack labels (FOPL) on the nutritional quality and cost of a daily consumption basket. We employ a difference in difference experimental design, between subjects, to cleanly identify the impact of FOPL. 691 subjects issued from the general population shop twice within a catalog of 290 products: a first time without and a second unannounced time with labels. Purchases are real. We test five different labels and compare result against a benchmark treatment in which subjects shop twice with no labels. Labels include the existing Multiple Traffic Lights, Reference Intakes and Health Star Rating, and two newly proposed designs: NutriScore, a 5-color synthetic label, and SENS, a frequency-based recommendation label. We measure nutritional quality using the FSA score. All labels but Reference Intakes significantly improve nutritional quality. NutriScore is significantly more effective than all other labels, followed by the Australian Health Star and Multiple Traffic Lights. The nutritional improvements due to the labeling come at an economic cost, as the average cost of 2000Kcal increases for all labels. Nonetheless, we show that the extra cost for a unit nutritional improvement is borne mainly by richer households. Behaviorally, change is concentrated in the extremal categories of each label. Easier to understand labels have a higher impact and crowd out more successfully other information cues like ingredients lists and nutritional tables.
Keywords: NUTRITIONAL LABELS; EXPERIMENT; FRONT-OF-PACK (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-exp and nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://gael.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/sites/gael/fil ... 2018/gael2018-11.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Nutritional and economic impact of 5 alternative front-of-pack nutritional labels: experimental evidence (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2018-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgnÃ¨s Vertier ().