Intuitions About Lagrangian Optimization

Dan Kalman (kalman@american.edu) and Michael Hoy
Additional contact information
Dan Kalman: Department of Mathematics, American University

No 1003, Working Papers from University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance

Abstract: We expose a weakness in an intuitive description popularly associated with the method of Lagrange multipliers and propose an alternative intuition. According to the deficient intuition, the Lagrange technique transforms a constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained optimization problem. This is both mathematically incorrect, and in some contexts contrary to a basic understanding of economic principles. In fact, as is probably understood by most instructors, solutions to the Lagrange conditions for a constrained optimization problem are generally saddle points, an observation typically included in advanced treatments of mathematical economics. At the introductory level, however, instructors often ‘cut corners’ and emphasize that the first-order conditions associated with the method of Lagrange multipliers are essentially the same as for an unconstrained optimization problem, hence leading to an incorrect intuition. We propose an alternative intuition that introduces the Lagrangian function as a perturbation of the original objective function. We characterize a constrained optimum as a point at which all the derivatives of a suitable perturbation must vanish. The paper is both useful for instructors of introductory courses in mathematical methods for economics and also can be used to provide enrichment to students for this very important mathematical technique.

Keywords: Constrained optimization; Lagrange method; Transformation fallacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 C02 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uoguelph.ca/economics/repec/workingpapers/2010/2010-03.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gue:guelph:2010-3.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stephen Kosempel (kosempel@uoguelph.ca).