Why are there so few Women in Executive Positions? An Analysis of Gender Differences in the Life-Cycle of Executive Employment
Anders Frederiksen () and
No 2015-6, Working Papers from University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa
â€œGlass ceilingsâ€ and â€œsticky floorsâ€ are typical explanations for the low representation of women in top executive positions, but a focus on gender differences in promotions provides only a partial explanation. We consider the life-cycle of executive employment, which allows for a full characterization of the gender composition of executive management. We establish that there are few women in executive management because they have lower levels of human capital, are underrepresented in lower-level jobs, and are less likely to be perceived as high-productivity employees. We do not find that women have uniformly unfavorable promotion and demotion probabilities.
Pages: 26 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hrm, nep-pr~ and nep-ltv
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://uhero.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/WP_2015-6.pdf First version, 2015 (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Why are there so few women in executive positions? An analysis of gender differences in the life-cycle of executive employment (2015)
Working Paper: Why Are There So Few Women in Executive Positions? An Analysis of Gender Differences in the Life-Cycle of Executive Employment (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hae:wpaper:2015-6
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by UHERO ().