Testing Theories of Reciprocity: Do Motivations Matter?
Luca Stanca (),
Luigino Bruni () and
Luca Corazzini ()
Post-Print from HAL
One of the key issues for understanding reciprocity is how agents evaluate the kindness of an action. In this paper we investigate experimentally the hypothesis that the motivation driving an action is relevant for its perceived kindness and, as a consequence, for reciprocal behavior. In particular, we examine the hypothesis that, for a given distributional outcome, positive reciprocity is less strong in response to strategically motivated actions than to non-strategically motivated actions. Our results indicate that, both at the aggregate and the individual level, reciprocity is significantly stronger when strategic motivations can be ruled out. These findings suggest that intentions matter and, in particular, that models of intention-based reciprocity should take into account the nature of the motivations behind choices.
Keywords: Reciprocity; Motivations; Laboratory Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00693819
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier, 2009, 71 (2), pp.233. 〈10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.009〉
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Testing theories of reciprocity: Do motivations matter? (2009)
Working Paper: Testing Theories of Reciprocity: Do Motivations Matter? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00693819
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().