Better stuck together or free to go? Of the stability of cooperation when individuals have outside options
Alexia Gaudeul (),
Paolo Crosetto and
Post-Print from HAL
How do outside options affect cooperation? We examine the stability of cooperation and the reasons for exit in public projects with stochastic outcomes, imperfect monitoring and an exit option. We find that treatments with high barriers to exit generate higher welfare overall as they foster stability and prevent inefficient separation of pairs. There is excessive exit in treatments with low barriers to exit, driven in part by an overestimate of the likelihood that the peer will leave and a desire not to be left alone in the public project. We contrast long-term "strategic" and short-term "egoistic" drivers of exit and find that short-term cost-benefit considerations play a more important role in treatments with lower barriers to exit.
Keywords: economic behaviour; public goods; stability; public good; input output; belief; cooperation; exit; outside option; entrée sortie; bien public; économie expérimentale; collaboration; comportement économique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01461165
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Economic Psychology, 2017, 59 (April), pp.99-112. ⟨10.1016/j.joep.2017.01.005⟩
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Better stuck together or free to go? Of the stability of cooperation when individuals have outside options (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01461165
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().