Autonomy, Conformity and Organizational Learning

Nobuyuki Hanaki and Hideo Owan

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: There is often said to be a tension between the two types of organizational learning activities, exploration and exploitation. The argument goes that the two activities are substitutes, competing for scarce resources when firms need different capabilities and management policies. We present another explanation, attributing the tension to the dynamic interactions among search, knowledge sharing, evaluation and alignment within organizations. Our results show that successful organizations tend to bifurcate into two types: those that always promote individual initiatives and build organizational strengths on individual learning and those good at assimilating the individual knowledge base and exploiting shared knowledge. Straddling the two types often fails. The intuition is that an equal mixture of individual search and assimilation slows down individual learning, while at the same time making it difficult to update organizational knowledge because individuals' knowledge base is not sufficiently homogenized. Straddling is especially inefficient when the operation is sufficiently complex or when the business environment is sufficiently turbulent.

Keywords: ambidexter; complexity; exploitation; exploration; NK landscape; organizational learning; turbulence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-01499607v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Administrative Sciences, 2013, 3 (3), pp.32-52. ⟨10.3390/admsci3030032⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://amu.hal.science/hal-01499607v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Autonomy, Conformity and Organizational Learning (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01499607

DOI: 10.3390/admsci3030032

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().