L'utilisation stratégique des instances de normalisation environnementale
Hounaida Ben Youssef,
Gilles Grolleau () and
Khaïreddine Jebsi
Additional contact information
Hounaida Ben Youssef: Université de Sousse
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Despite the several benefits attributed to voluntary standards, these standards may open room to strategies aiming at disadvantaging rivals. We identify several ‘vulnerable areas' related to the standard setting, implementation and enforcement stages where such strategies may arise. Indeed, each stage can constitute a strategic area where a firm (or a group of firms) may attempt to raise its rivals' costs (Salop and Scheffman 1983; Salop and Scheffman 1987) while legitimizing its behavior by welfare enhancing arguments. Indeed, instigators may ‘instrumentalize' the pro-environmental effects or the consumer protection provided by their devices to capture the standard process. Three brief case studies – i.e., Allied Tube, Bic, DuPont de Nemours – are developed to illustrate the risks related to the standardization process. We also stress potential counter strategies and draw some policy considerations, especially the ambiguous effects on society welfare.
Keywords: AUGMENTATION DES COUTS; ANTI-CONCURRENCE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Revue internationale de droit économique, 2005, 4, pp.367-388. ⟨10.3917/ride.194.0367⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: L'utilisation stratégique des instances de normalisation environnementale (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02678969
DOI: 10.3917/ride.194.0367
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().