Lost in translation? Transferring creativity insights from arts into management

Annick Ancelin-Bourguignon, Chris Dorsett and Ricardo Azambuja
Additional contact information
Chris Dorsett: Northumbria University [Newcastle]
Ricardo Azambuja: ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Since the early 2000s the business sector has, as a matter of both professional and academic concern, repeatedly advocated the transfer of artistic practices, especially those deemed exemplary forms of creativity, to a management world grappling with new challenges – a claim we here call the ‘transferability thesis' in order to consider the responses made to what Boltanski and Chiapello define as an artistic critique of capitalism. Drawing on the wide range of relevant academic literature, this article critically examines the plausibility of the ‘thesis'. To this end, we review analytical literature advocating artistic transfers alongside empirical work that examines art interventions within organizations. Both are important components of a broader organizational aesthetics approach even though, we contend, neither strands of research provide a plausible argument for meaningful transferability. We then draw on arts-based literature, management theory and psychology to compare notions of creativity at both ends of the proposed transferral process. We highlight convergence and variance in art and business thinking, noting fundamental mismatches with regard to utility, rationalization and heteronomy – three levels of incompatibility that make a genuine transplantation of art ideas highly unlikely. Finally, we discuss our critical contribution in relation to the specious status of the ‘thesis' and the centrality of Boltanski and Chiapello's triadic model of capitalism to our investigation. By way of a conclusion, we suggest that further research is needed to examine the symbolic nature of appeals to artistic creativity by management.

Keywords: Artistic critique of capitalism; arts; creativity; management; organizational aesthetics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Organization, 2020, 27 (5), pp.717-741. ⟨10.1177/1350508419855716⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02966899

DOI: 10.1177/1350508419855716

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().