Track choice and socio-economic origin: measuring and explaining academic inhibition

Nina Guyon and Elise Huillery

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Pupils from modest socio-economic backgrounds choose less selective academic tracks than others at the same level of ability. Pupils from more modest backgrounds underestimate their own ability; they believe that they are less likely to succeed in a selective academic track, and they have a tendency to conform to the choices of their peers. In addition, outside influence (from the parents or school) over the course of the last year of junior high tends to exacerbate the gap for weaker students, but narrow the gap for stronger students. We propose specific policy interventions based on these findings.

Date: 2016-02
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03392016v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in LIEPP Policy Brief, 2016, 23, ⟨10.25647/liepp.pb.23⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03392016v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Track choice and socio-economic origin: measuring and explaining academic inhibition (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03392016

DOI: 10.25647/liepp.pb.23

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().