Has Megaproject management lost its way ? Lessons from History

Sylvain Lenfle and Christoph Loch ()
Additional contact information
Sylvain Lenfle: LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This chapter illustrates the management of uncertainty, of stakeholders, and of contractors, and then draws on history—the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb, and Cold War-era space and defense projects such as Polaris and Apollo—to show that knowledge of how to overcome these issues has long existed and could be used effectively in some megaprojects today. For example, Manhattan Project manager General Groves realized that big unforeseeable uncertainties in designing atomic weapons required discrete project management skills including flexibility, but these techniques have since been pushed aside in a managerial push for control that became the phased-planning or "stage-gate" process philosophy. While some successes in the 1940s and 1950s may not be repeated today with the same managerial methods, because stakeholder complexity was lower at a time when huge projects served "national priorities," it is argued that some mid-twentieth-century managerial techniques would help improve modern megaprojects.

Date: 2017
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://cnam.hal.science/hal-03640779
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Bent Flyvbjerg. The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, 1, Oxford University Press, 2017, 9780198732242. ⟨10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732242.013.2⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://cnam.hal.science/hal-03640779/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03640779

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732242.013.2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().