Seemingly irrelevant information? The impact of legal team size on third party perceptions

Gilles Grolleau, Murat Mungan and Naoufel Mzoughi
Additional contact information
Gilles Grolleau: ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - ESSCA – École supérieure des sciences commerciales d'Angers = ESSCA Business School
Murat Mungan: George Mason University [Fairfax]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: People often appear to use irrelevant information in forming judgments about others. Using survey experiments, we show that seemingly irrelevant facts may actually be informative of actors' choices, which third parties can use to update their beliefs. Specifically, we show that subjects' perceived severity and recommended punishment for offenses are significantly increasing in the number of lawyers representing defendants. However, once subjects are informed that the defendant was randomly assigned a specific number of lawyers, the significant relationship between the perceived seriousness of the offense and the number of lawyers largely vanishes. Thus, third parties in our benchmark analysis may be using the defendant's legal team size as a proxy to update their beliefs regarding the nature of the offense committed, as opposed to being affected by irrelevant factors in forming judgments. This is because randomization makes it impossible for third parties to draw inferences regarding the nature of the offense committed by the defendant based on the number of lawyers. However, for some offenses, we find that increasing the number of lawyers raises third parties' recommended sanctions even when the number of lawyers is randomly determined, which is consistent with a psychological phenomenon called 'luck envy'.

Keywords: Lawyers; Third party perceptions; Moral judgment; Social intuitionism; Luck envy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03843247v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in International Review of Law and Economics, 2022, 71, pp.106068. ⟨10.1016/j.irle.2022.106068⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03843247v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Seemingly irrelevant information? The impact of legal team size on third party perceptions (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03843247

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2022.106068

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().