Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared
Keith Head and
Thierry Mayer
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Constant elasticity of substitution (CES) demand for monopolistically competitive firm-varieties is a standard tool for models in international trade and macroeconomics. Inter-variety substitution in this model follows a simple share proportionality rule. In contrast, the standard toolkit in industrial organization (IO) estimates a demand system in which cross-elasticities depend on similarity in observable attributes. The gain in realism from the IO approach comes at the expense of requiring richer data and greater computational challenges. This paper uses the data generating process of Berry et al. (1995), BLP, who established the modern IO method, to simulate counterfactual trade policy experiments. We use the CES model as an approximation of the more complex underlying demand system and market structure. Although the CES model omits key elements of the data generating process, the errors are offsetting, allowing it to fit BLP-based predictions closely. For aggregate outcomes, it turns out that incorporating non-unitary pass-through matters more than fixing oversimplified substitution patterns.
Keywords: Constant Elasticity of Substitution; Industrial Organization; Oligopoly; Trade; Tariffs; Counterfactual analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-com, nep-int and nep-reg
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04347301v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Review of Economics and Statistics, inPress, ⟨10.1162/rest_a_01369⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04347301v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2023) 
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2022) 
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared (2022) 
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared (2021) 
Working Paper: Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04347301
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01369
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).